Excellence in Design
Recognizes planning and development or significant rehabilitation of outdoor park and recreation spaces where the majority of the site does not contain buildings, structures or facilities and that result in higher levels of community use.
One Excellence Award may be awarded in each category and each class. Project must have been completed between November 1, 2015 and October 31, 2016.
Congratulations to our
2016 Park Planning Award Winners!
Community, Class 1
Cunningham Engineering Corporation for Dunnell Nature Park & Education Center, City of Fairfield
Community, Class 2
City of San Mateo for Beresford Play Area Renovation
Community, Class 3
David Volz Design Landscape Architects, Inc for Stanton Central Park, City of Stanton
Neighborhood, Class 1
David Evans and Assoc. Inc, for Memory Lane Park, City of Santa Ana
Neighborhood, Class 2
RHAA Landscape Architecture + Planning for Mission Bay Kid's Park
Regional, Class 2
City of Waterford for Tuolumne River Parkway
Specialty, Class 1
City of Temecula for Inclusive and Accessible Playground and Splash Pad
Neighborhood: parks, playgrounds or open space less than 10 acres in size which typically serve an immediate neighborhood
Community: parks, open spaces or sports complexes less than 50 acres in size which typically serve community wide needs
Regional: parks, open spaces or sports complexes greater than 50 acres in size which typically serve several communities
Specialty: unique, single use parks, open spaces or trails that do not fit in any of the above divisions, i.e. skate parks, dog parks, arboretum, etc.
Based on Project Cost ²
- Class 1 $0 - $2 million
- Class 2 $2 million - $10 million
- Class 3 $10 million and above
¹ Construction or rehabilitation of a segment within a park should be first categorized by park type, i.e. neighborhood, community, or regional and then by project cost.
² Include total construction costs and site improvements, fixtures/furnishings and equipment. Do not include personnel related project costs, master planning fees, acquisition of property, construction management fees, special testing or other non-construction costs
Challenge: Describe the organizational challenge or compelling community need the entry addressed. [250 word maximum] (20 pts)
Resourcefulness: Describe how the entry demonstrates the use of unique architectural elements or responds to challenging environmental, cultural or site constraints or integrated "green" construction materials, systems, management or maintenance practices. [400 word maximum] (25 pts)
Execution: Describe the various strategies, tools, resources and outreach efforts the entry used to address the challenge, including the use of non-traditional fiscal or community resources i.e., grants, sponsorships, foundations, volunteers and the communication efforts used to inform, engage and receive feedback from the community, policy makers or stakeholders. [400 word maximum] (20 pts)
Accomplishment: Describe the substantial community benefit, improved operational efficiencies, new or increased value in the community, or enhancement(s) to the provision of park and recreation services the entry achieved. Include measurable results. [400 word maximum] (25 pts)
Mission: Describe how the entry supports the Parks Make Life Better!® campaign messages of creating spaces and places for access to nature, outdoor space for play and exercise, self-directed and directed recreation, facilitating social connections, lifelong learning, or the arts. [250 word maximum] (10 pts)